"We will continue to further develop and introduce products that enhance the lives of Dutch consumers," Samsung added. Apple did not respond to a request for comment.Ī Samsung spokeswoman said in an emailed statement it welcomed the ruling, "which affirms our position that our products do not infringe Apple's intellectual property", Samsung said. Most important is that professional developers who are familiar with the possibilities to disable part of a touch screen to prevent unwanted input, will assume that the technique used in Android 2.3, 3.0 and higher - which Apple said Samsung's Galaxy infringed on - "do not fall under the protection of the scope of the patent", according to the verdict.Īpple can appeal this verdict, a spokeswoman for the Court of The Hague said. The technology used in Android is sufficiently different from Apple's patented technology, the judges wrote. ![]() The judges mostly followed this line of argumentation. Android uses a more hierarchical, similar system and doesn't apply exclusivity to one "view", Samsungs lawyer argued during the plea hearing in September, adding that Samsung's Galay's therefore do not infringe on Apple's patent. Apple developed and patented a technique to prevent unwanted touches by giving each element of the user interface, also known as a "view," exclusivity. Therefore, developers need a method to let a user control some buttons on the screen simultaneously, while disabling others on the same screen.īoth Android and iOS have a method to disable parts of the touchscreen. ![]() But it can also be undesirable to let the gamer push parts of the screen such as the menu bar because that can interrupt the game unexpectedly. In video games for instance, it is desirable for a player to operate different control buttons at the same time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |